Posts
baby travel systems comparison image
Nicole
??? im writing an essay about the us health care system... which i know nothing about. if anyone would like to elaborate on maybe.. the comparison between the health care system in the us and other countries, and what how the us might attempt to fix these problems, it would help SO much. I need some basics... health care for dummies.. and then some. its hard to write an essay on something you know nothing about. i've tried to research, but it seems that everything i find is for people who already know what theyre talking about.
Answer
The NHS (Great Britain's National Health Care System) started in the very way American health care reform was promoted by the Democrats, the left and Obama. More than sixty years ago, Britain's original plan was to provide universal care to the half of the population - mainly women, children and the elderly - who had no health coverage.
In the United States Obama has decided to exploit 10% of the uninsured as a means to coerce the other 90% to submit to a system the majority rejects.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/catosletter/catosletterv3n1.pdf
Barry, Harry and Nancy, the tyrannical trio, are in the process of imposing health care reform at a time when the world watches in horror as the British prototype falls apart.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255842/Mother-Aida-Los-fury-babys-death-crisis-hit-John-Radcliffe-Hospital.html
Unable to sustain the high cost of "free" health care, Britain's NHS officially hit the rocks and its crumpled body is presently lying dead at the bottom of a socialist ravine. Yet, the President remains resolute in his desire to push America over a similar precipice, well aware that rationing is in America's future
To save money in an already abysmal health care system, Britain plans to implement further rationing. Unbeknownst to the British people, lines will be even longer for ill-fated patients destined to die of dehydration at the hands of "lazy" nurses in understaffed government run hospitals.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255858/Neglected-lazy-nurses-Kane-Gorny-22-dying-thirst-rang-police-beg-water.html
In the future, if traveling to England, tourists should also be prepared to see many more crippled, blind people with crooked teeth, because the NHS plans to judiciously mete out knee and hip replacements, cataract surgery, and orthodontic procedures.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/7908742/Axe-falls-on-NHS-services.html
Yet, Obama presses on.
British patient advocate groups are calling the draconian NHS measures "astonishingly brutal." An overbite is nothing compared to what "free" health care, akin to the type Obama promises Americans, will be delivering to our friends across the pond, especially the elderly. Apparently, "widespread cuts ... have already been agreed to by senior health service officials," better known in America as "death panels." - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aogCaGv9i78&feature=player_embedded
Maybe one day when the world acknowledges the injustice of denying care to the elderly, there will be an exhibition similar to the shoe heap http://remember.org/jacobs/ShoeHeap.html at the Auschwitz-Birkenau museum, only the pile will be comprised of discarded walkers. o_O
The NHS (Great Britain's National Health Care System) started in the very way American health care reform was promoted by the Democrats, the left and Obama. More than sixty years ago, Britain's original plan was to provide universal care to the half of the population - mainly women, children and the elderly - who had no health coverage.
In the United States Obama has decided to exploit 10% of the uninsured as a means to coerce the other 90% to submit to a system the majority rejects.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/catosletter/catosletterv3n1.pdf
Barry, Harry and Nancy, the tyrannical trio, are in the process of imposing health care reform at a time when the world watches in horror as the British prototype falls apart.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255842/Mother-Aida-Los-fury-babys-death-crisis-hit-John-Radcliffe-Hospital.html
Unable to sustain the high cost of "free" health care, Britain's NHS officially hit the rocks and its crumpled body is presently lying dead at the bottom of a socialist ravine. Yet, the President remains resolute in his desire to push America over a similar precipice, well aware that rationing is in America's future
To save money in an already abysmal health care system, Britain plans to implement further rationing. Unbeknownst to the British people, lines will be even longer for ill-fated patients destined to die of dehydration at the hands of "lazy" nurses in understaffed government run hospitals.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255858/Neglected-lazy-nurses-Kane-Gorny-22-dying-thirst-rang-police-beg-water.html
In the future, if traveling to England, tourists should also be prepared to see many more crippled, blind people with crooked teeth, because the NHS plans to judiciously mete out knee and hip replacements, cataract surgery, and orthodontic procedures.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/7908742/Axe-falls-on-NHS-services.html
Yet, Obama presses on.
British patient advocate groups are calling the draconian NHS measures "astonishingly brutal." An overbite is nothing compared to what "free" health care, akin to the type Obama promises Americans, will be delivering to our friends across the pond, especially the elderly. Apparently, "widespread cuts ... have already been agreed to by senior health service officials," better known in America as "death panels." - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aogCaGv9i78&feature=player_embedded
Maybe one day when the world acknowledges the injustice of denying care to the elderly, there will be an exhibition similar to the shoe heap http://remember.org/jacobs/ShoeHeap.html at the Auschwitz-Birkenau museum, only the pile will be comprised of discarded walkers. o_O
Is AIDS carried to the child if the sperm is contaminated through artificial egg insemination?
blueblaze_
Is AIDS carried to the child if the sperm is contaminated through artificial egg insemination?
Lets say the man has AIDS. Does his sperm carry the virus with which he fertilizes the egg with, which has been taken out of the female for artificial insemination? Meaning is the child going to have the virus if his sperm fuses with an egg. If so, is there a way to prevent the virus from going to the child?
Answer
From what I understand, when the sperm enters the female body or artificially inseminated, the AIDS virus can't do anything dangerous at that point (except for infecting the woman). AIDS doesn't infect the fetus because at that point there are little remaining virus cells in comparison to the point at which the zygote is. And also the AIDS virus is a large one as cell size goes, that is why it can't be contracted from simple skin contact, it has to enter through a larger opening such as a cut. So as an over view, the AIDS virus won't infect the fetus fast enough before it dies and there really isn't anything to infect, but later on there may be some problems.
If the mother has the AIDS virus there is a 50% chance that the baby will be born with it. The reason is that AIDS generally travels through the blood stream and that may pass through the ambilical cord. Though it may do this, it still may not infect the child. As I said the AIDS virus is large and may just pass through there blood system, and that is where it goes back to the mothers bloodstream. Though the virus can still be contract in other manners and in the birthing process. So its a 50-50 chance if done properly.
From what I understand, when the sperm enters the female body or artificially inseminated, the AIDS virus can't do anything dangerous at that point (except for infecting the woman). AIDS doesn't infect the fetus because at that point there are little remaining virus cells in comparison to the point at which the zygote is. And also the AIDS virus is a large one as cell size goes, that is why it can't be contracted from simple skin contact, it has to enter through a larger opening such as a cut. So as an over view, the AIDS virus won't infect the fetus fast enough before it dies and there really isn't anything to infect, but later on there may be some problems.
If the mother has the AIDS virus there is a 50% chance that the baby will be born with it. The reason is that AIDS generally travels through the blood stream and that may pass through the ambilical cord. Though it may do this, it still may not infect the child. As I said the AIDS virus is large and may just pass through there blood system, and that is where it goes back to the mothers bloodstream. Though the virus can still be contract in other manners and in the birthing process. So its a 50-50 chance if done properly.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment