Showing posts with label baby travel systems 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label baby travel systems 2011. Show all posts

Friday, June 13, 2014

Are pregnant Mainland Chinese allowed to come to Taiwan now to have their babies?




We left an


I see what has been happening in Hong Kong.
http://www.hkdigit.net/2011/10/hk-march-against-mainland-chinese-pregnant-mothers/

With the expansion of travel from Mainland China to Taiwan granted by the KMT, how long will it be before a lot of mothers-to-be start planting their PRC children in Taiwan?
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2011/05/06/chinas-wealth-drain/#axzz1lfWNzC00
In the past decade the number of babies born to mainland women who are not married to Hong Kongers jumped from 620 in 2001 to 32,563 last year.
"Honey, I'm going into labor. Get me on a plane to Taipei, NOW!"
(We can talk about how "all Taiwanese became Chinese" at a later date... OK?)



Answer
I am no immigration law expert, but from what I know, the short answer is yes.

The situation in Hong Kong is that pregnant Chinese women are going to Hong Kong to have children, leading to locals to stage a protest, arguing that public health resources are directed toward non-local people. As a result, public hospitals are crowded out, forcing Hong Kong women to seek higher priced medical service at private hospitals. While the number of pregnant women in mainland China traveling to Hong Kong have increased, it is thought that most of them are wealthy enough to buy their way into Hong Kong, the financial barrier is still great for most mainland Chinese.

From the public health perspective, Taiwan is already facing this kind of pressure, because Taiwanese doctors have all but fled the more traditional roles (pediatrics, surgical units, internal medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology), more and more doctors are seeking to practice in cosmetic surgery, which is much more lucrative in terms of effort and income ratio. If pregnant mainland Chinese come to Taiwan to have their babies, it is bound to have some impact on Taiwan's medical resources.

I know you are concerned about the issue of immigration, more so than the problems with Taiwan's public health. So here is my opinion.

There's a gradual increase of Taiwanese marrying mainland Chinese, and vice versa, happening in recent years, the government have set up tight control over who gets to enter Taiwan from mainland China. However, it does not seem there are tight rules over pregnant women seeking to have their babies in Taiwan. The same issue with having babies elsewhere, in Hong Kong or Taiwan, is the financial barrier. Taiwan's universal health care does not cover foreign individuals, therefore patients are required to pay at the full cost, which is quite a heavy sum.

Now if the situation is that PRC parents coming to Taiwan to have children, the current rule is that you still have to apply for legal status, which may or may not be approved. If one of the parents is a Taiwanese national, then you have a greater chance of being approved, providing that you have proof of parental DNA relationship. Both situations above require many paperwork, and is not easily fulfilled. To be honest, I think most mainland Chinese prefer to immigrate to the US, given that they can afford it. By the way, Hong Kong people also have a greater chance of being accepted to Taiwan.

In my opinion, Taiwan can probably take advantage of mainland Chinese immigrating to Taiwan. First of all, communist China will probably hesitate to raise a war with Taiwan, because it will cause casualties on their side. This might ease the tension across the straits. Secondly, to a raise a child in Taiwan is no small feat, Taiwan can harvest a lot of taxes off those rich mainland Chinese parents. Lastly, immigrating to Taiwan is very complicated, though I cannot definitively tell you there are no loopholes, I will tell you that once a mainland Chinese baby go Taiwanese, there's no turning back, because our system plainly works better.

How do senior citizens deal with ends meet during the recession(2011)?




YokoProduc


Hi, I'm doing a speech on why senior citizens are practically forced to work and why they shouldn't. I know that in 2009 the recession pulled out senior citizens from retirement to meet ends meet, put food on the table, pay for medication, childcare, and etc. but is there any other good reasons why? and what happened to all their benefits? I don't really understand how state pensions and social security benefits and stuff like that work. Please explain and help me.
if $1200 a month is all you get during a bad economy, than doesn't that put you in a position wanting to work more? that's my question. How are you able to pay for medication and etc. Isn't this why senior citizens need to work?



Answer
Hope this helps. I retired after working for the Federal Government for 4 decades. I was lucky when I retired and have a good life. When my parents worked, everybody made enough money to have a house, eat OK and make ends met even if they were not rich. then in my generation born in the 1940's and 1950's (Baby Boomers) we started out Great! we could buy new cars and houses and life was good. But it got worse over the years.
It was a slow erosion of benefits. They started to take a little away each few years.
1. Businesses started to cut work hours. If they did not work 40 hours a week then the business did not have to pay them benefits and kept the money for themselves.
2. People were told to put money into a 401K accounts and it would be a great retirement but 401K's were paid in the stock market so when prices went down in the stock market the retirement funds went down too. For example, If you have $200,000 in your retirement account and the market collapsed so your account was not worth $100,000 then you knew it would not be enough for you to live all your life retired so you had to keep working.
3. Companies went bankrupt. People were laid off. Can't pay for the house so the bank takes their house back. Maybe you still have a job and paying for your house but you can't sell it because lots of the neighbors lost their houses and they are all empty so nobody will buy yours either and it isn't worth much anymore.
4. Health care companies got greedy. costs went very high. Years ago, people just paid the doctor or hospital and didn't need insurance. Costs are too high now. Easy $200,000 just for one hospital visit now or more.
5. State governments make promises to get votes and can't pay for promises. Like California where I lived so long. They are broke but still pay for free college. The governor, Jerry Brown, in California just signed a law that Mexicans coming illegally into the state can go to free college! who is going to pay? The state can't afford it so they just cut the poor state workers benefits and retirement. people suffer. Why would the state make the Americans work to pay for illegal Mexicans to have free school! crazy things like that are going on and no one changes it.
6. Social Security is still there and it has not changed too much. Now people get about $1200 a month but that isn't much to live on If you don't get some other money from a company retirement or 401K or savings. t will be worse in the future. Bad planning so money coming in from workers doesn't cover the payments to the retired.

You can see that it is a very big problem that you are giving a speech on and it was not caused by any one thing. It was not sudden. It was very slow and took decades. that's why most of us didn't see it coming and didn't plan differently. We trusted the system!

It was all either BAD PLANNING OR GREED. Baby Boomers had too much trust. We counted on companies and governments and not ourselves. We trusted 401K's and other retirement accounts and shouldn't have. We should have questioned the politicians and demanded they stop spending so much. We should have saved the money into our own bank accounts so no one can take it from us. We should have been careful to work for big companies and watch what they did to us or work for ourselves. Now the recession hits just as we get old enough to retire and we are in trouble. Many of us can't live and must work when we are too old and it is a shame.

My advice to the young? Trust yourself. Save some money from everything you get and buy gold with it. Even just a little each year. Save it in a very good place or bank security box and tell no body! Buy a small house in a very good neighborhood and pay it off as fast as possible so the bank can' t ever take it. And when you are old like me you will be comfortable and can travel and sleep all you want!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Best Infant Car Seat/Travel System?

Q. Hi,we are expecting our first child and need help on infant car seats. We are either going to get a full travel system or a bugaboo cameleon stroller and just an infant car seat. So if you could please suggest infant car seats and/or travel systems that would be great! Thanks so much!


Answer
I got the Chicco Keyfit 30 Travel System for my son. It's a little pricey, but it was rated the safest car seat of 2011 by Consumer Reports. I haven't had any problems with it and I felt so relieved as a new mom as well to know my baby was in the safest car seat for the year. Definitely look into it and see if you guys would like it. Good luck with your search!! And congrats on the baby. :)

A good tandem travel system?

Q. I'm looking for a good tandem (double) travel system stroller....one that i can snap a car seat onto it but can also b used when the child is able to sit up...like a regular stroller...the brand doesn't matter...right now i'm using an eddie bauer system and will need to upgrade come july 2011


Answer
What exactly are you looking for? Something for twins or something for an older child and a newborn?

Add: Judging from your other questions, I'm assuming you are pregnant and have your 3 month old.

Honestly? It's unhealthy to put a baby in a baby carrier in a car seat because they should only be in the car seat as little as possible. It sits them at an angle that isn't good for breathing as well as curves them so that their digestion isn't as good. So until the newborn is 4months old or so, you really don't need to worry about a replacement.

For me, I decided to use a baby chest carrier (the Ergo) for the newborn and the stroller for my 2 year old. This is SO much easier (and safer) than when I used a baby seat in the stroller for my first. It also gives you more time and more options as far as double-strollers go. You can look at a doublestroller that doesn't lay completely flat instead of having to find one that lays flat.

However if you really want a double-stroller or need it because of your back or what have you, then the Chicco Together is one of the best I've seen. It has a fully reclining back seat and is the one I'd get if I was to get one.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Good evening Canucks Please explain the following?




RayHere


A women in western Canada flew to the U S to have her record 8 kids you told us there was a bed shortage so why do you fly in a high risk?
A English actress had a skiing accident in eastern Canada she was air-vaced over night to the U S you told us she was already dead So why over night with a doctor? Don't you investigate accidental deaths in Canada?
Why did one of your government ministers come to the U S to have his operation?
Why did you want to pull the plug on baby Joseph?
I know you well want to clear all this up as our site were alive with you Canucks telling us of your free and better health care
Awaiting your insightful replies



Answer
While I don't claim that the Canadian Health Care system is perfect, I do believe it is better than the American system. That said, even if Canada had a similar health care system as the U.S, there would still be people that crossed the boarder. For different reasons.

Large American cities are sometimes closer than large Canadian cities. Cities such as Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver, are few and far between. So it's sometimes its faster to go to an American city. An example is Windsor, which is about 5h from Toronto, but just across the bridge from Detroit. Large cities, also, develop expertise in certain fields. Such as Oncology, Pediatrics, Neurology, Cardiology, and so on. Again, Canada has has only 3 major cities, where as the U.S has many.

Just because a few Canadian go to the U.S for health care, doesn't makes the American system better. It's just a red herring. There is a growing amount of Americans traveling to third world countries, like India, to get treatment. Does that mean that India has better health care?

As for baby Joseph. I want to know what you think of the following article.

http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2011/03/22/17708861.html

Can my Canadian partner apply for another visa during her 2 year Tier 5 Youth Mobility scheme visa?

Q. My partner is a Canadian citizen who has been in the UK on a tier 5 youth mobility scheme since April 2009. We have been together for around 3 years and we spent the first year traveling back and forth from Canada & Scotland to be together (I am a UK citizen). We have recently fallen pregnant together and we are planning on getting married in January 2011, with the baby being due around May. My partners visa runs out April 2011 (1 month before our due date) and we are wondering if anyone can give us any ideas about her staying in the UK to have the baby.

The youth mobility scheme doesnt seem to offer too much options from what I have read on the government websites so we are wondering if anyone out there has been in the same situation or if anyone else has a better knowledge than us.

We would be grateful if you could give us any guidance from the above information and let us know what our options are about my partner remaining in the UK after April 2009. Can we apply to have her visa status changed? Is she entitled by law to remain here to have the baby as I am a UK citizen? Any information/guidance anyone can give us will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance
Thanks for your answer Ozmaniac.

We are both older than 21 so that shouldn't cause a problem.

As the father of the child and myself being a UK citizen, why on earth would the person who is carrying my baby not be allowed to have the birth in th UK. Basically the government are telling me that I dont have any rights have the birth of my child in my homeland. Does that seem right? It seems very very steep to me.

This is one of the many reasons I have been thinking about leaving this country, never to return.


Answer
The YMS section of the UKBA website states:
"While you are in the United Kingdom under the youth mobility scheme, you are not allowed to switch into any other category of the points-based system or in to a visitor route."
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/workingintheuk/tier5/youthmobilityscheme/eligibility/whocanapply/

Applying for permission to remain as the partner of a British citizen is neither on the points-based system nor is it a visitor route so after your marriage, there is nothing in the YMS restrictions to stop her applying to remain as your partner if all other requirements are met. You must both be over 21.
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/partnersandfamilies/partners/husbandswivescivilpartners/

Because your partner is subject to immigration control, she will probably need to apply for a Certificate of Approval to marry. The procedure and any grounds for exemption from the requirement are detailed on the following:
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/while-in-uk/marriageandcivilpartnership/

She has no entitlement to stay in the UK just because she is having a child with a British citizen and I can't see any other way for her to stay if she is under 21 and therefore ineligible to stay as your partner.

EDIT:
I know it's difficult to accept, but every country has the right to control as far as possible, who stays in that country and they do that by the issuing of visas to enable them to stay legally. If they simply allowed people who were part of a couple that was expecting a child to stay purely on that basis with little or no evidence of commitment to the relationship, the floodgates would open and every second student and visitor would be doing it. I know that Australia, Canada, the USA wouldn't allow her to stay unless she qualified for a spouse/partner visa and don't know of any other developed country that would be any different.

You intend marrying in January and your partner's visa doesn't expire until April so sorry, but I really can't see any problem. Just have her apply to stay on the basis of her marriage to a British citizen and she
will not only be able to stay for the birth but for as long as she wishes after that and, if I understand correctly the way things work in the UK, she'll even be able to have the NHS pick up the tab for the last stages of the pregnancy and the birth. Have I missed something?

EDIT:
My apologies for confusing the issue further, but it has just been pointed out to me (by Maggie, arguably the most knowledgeable authority on UK immigration on Answers), that elsewhere on the UKBA site, it states "there is no right to apply to live permanently in the United Kingdom (known as 'settlement' or 'indefinite leave to remain') if you are here under the youth mobility scheme under tier 5 of the points-based system.
You cannot apply for settlement from tier 5 and the time you spend in any tier 5 category will not count towards any settlement you may apply for in the future."
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/workingintheuk/tier5/youthmobilityscheme/settlement/

I believe that the statement above is very ambiguous because applying for limited leave to remain for a spouse is not applying for settlement, but I confess that I'm no longer sure that your partner will be able to stay on as I suggested above. I think you need professional advice. Start with the UKBA, but be prepared to pay for advice from an immigration lawyer or agent.

Good luck to both (all!) of you - hope it all works out without too many problems.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Monday, March 31, 2014

Anyone know of any good websites to get a cheap but good Travel System for my son?




Synika


My son is due pretty soon September 16, 2011.. :D I dunno why we waited so long.. But now we really need one soon and don't wanna drive 2 hours to Fort Worth to look for one so we're gonna order it. I've looked on Babies "R" Us, Target, Walmart, and Amazon and haven't found one i liked. We want a Blue and Brown one so bad. Anyone know of any other websites to get one on? A cheap travel system but good one.. Please help!


Answer
i know!
i know!
lol
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002RL7UQC/ref=s9_ri_bw_g75_ir04?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-11&pf_rd_r=1HG8PMVFZMC99JK820WC&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=1244177682&pf_rd_i=166842011
or this one
http://www.amazon.com/Evenflo-Select-Travel-System-Georgia/dp/B001H0GGS2/ref=pd_cp_ba_pw_4


the 2nd one is cheapest and cuter in my opinion!

Are pregnant Mainland Chinese allowed to come to Taiwan now to have their babies?




We left an


I see what has been happening in Hong Kong.
http://www.hkdigit.net/2011/10/hk-march-against-mainland-chinese-pregnant-mothers/

With the expansion of travel from Mainland China to Taiwan granted by the KMT, how long will it be before a lot of mothers-to-be start planting their PRC children in Taiwan?
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2011/05/06/chinas-wealth-drain/#axzz1lfWNzC00
In the past decade the number of babies born to mainland women who are not married to Hong Kongers jumped from 620 in 2001 to 32,563 last year.
"Honey, I'm going into labor. Get me on a plane to Taipei, NOW!"
(We can talk about how "all Taiwanese became Chinese" at a later date... OK?)



Answer
I am no immigration law expert, but from what I know, the short answer is yes.

The situation in Hong Kong is that pregnant Chinese women are going to Hong Kong to have children, leading to locals to stage a protest, arguing that public health resources are directed toward non-local people. As a result, public hospitals are crowded out, forcing Hong Kong women to seek higher priced medical service at private hospitals. While the number of pregnant women in mainland China traveling to Hong Kong have increased, it is thought that most of them are wealthy enough to buy their way into Hong Kong, the financial barrier is still great for most mainland Chinese.

From the public health perspective, Taiwan is already facing this kind of pressure, because Taiwanese doctors have all but fled the more traditional roles (pediatrics, surgical units, internal medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology), more and more doctors are seeking to practice in cosmetic surgery, which is much more lucrative in terms of effort and income ratio. If pregnant mainland Chinese come to Taiwan to have their babies, it is bound to have some impact on Taiwan's medical resources.

I know you are concerned about the issue of immigration, more so than the problems with Taiwan's public health. So here is my opinion.

There's a gradual increase of Taiwanese marrying mainland Chinese, and vice versa, happening in recent years, the government have set up tight control over who gets to enter Taiwan from mainland China. However, it does not seem there are tight rules over pregnant women seeking to have their babies in Taiwan. The same issue with having babies elsewhere, in Hong Kong or Taiwan, is the financial barrier. Taiwan's universal health care does not cover foreign individuals, therefore patients are required to pay at the full cost, which is quite a heavy sum.

Now if the situation is that PRC parents coming to Taiwan to have children, the current rule is that you still have to apply for legal status, which may or may not be approved. If one of the parents is a Taiwanese national, then you have a greater chance of being approved, providing that you have proof of parental DNA relationship. Both situations above require many paperwork, and is not easily fulfilled. To be honest, I think most mainland Chinese prefer to immigrate to the US, given that they can afford it. By the way, Hong Kong people also have a greater chance of being accepted to Taiwan.

In my opinion, Taiwan can probably take advantage of mainland Chinese immigrating to Taiwan. First of all, communist China will probably hesitate to raise a war with Taiwan, because it will cause casualties on their side. This might ease the tension across the straits. Secondly, to a raise a child in Taiwan is no small feat, Taiwan can harvest a lot of taxes off those rich mainland Chinese parents. Lastly, immigrating to Taiwan is very complicated, though I cannot definitively tell you there are no loopholes, I will tell you that once a mainland Chinese baby go Taiwanese, there's no turning back, because our system plainly works better.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, February 28, 2014

Anyone know of any good websites to get a cheap but good Travel System for my son?




Synika


My son is due pretty soon September 16, 2011.. :D I dunno why we waited so long.. But now we really need one soon and don't wanna drive 2 hours to Fort Worth to look for one so we're gonna order it. I've looked on Babies "R" Us, Target, Walmart, and Amazon and haven't found one i liked. We want a Blue and Brown one so bad. Anyone know of any other websites to get one on? A cheap travel system but good one.. Please help!


Answer
i know!
i know!
lol
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002RL7UQC/ref=s9_ri_bw_g75_ir04?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-11&pf_rd_r=1HG8PMVFZMC99JK820WC&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=1244177682&pf_rd_i=166842011
or this one
http://www.amazon.com/Evenflo-Select-Travel-System-Georgia/dp/B001H0GGS2/ref=pd_cp_ba_pw_4


the 2nd one is cheapest and cuter in my opinion!

Are pregnant Mainland Chinese allowed to come to Taiwan now to have their babies?




We left an


I see what has been happening in Hong Kong.
http://www.hkdigit.net/2011/10/hk-march-against-mainland-chinese-pregnant-mothers/

With the expansion of travel from Mainland China to Taiwan granted by the KMT, how long will it be before a lot of mothers-to-be start planting their PRC children in Taiwan?
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2011/05/06/chinas-wealth-drain/#axzz1lfWNzC00
In the past decade the number of babies born to mainland women who are not married to Hong Kongers jumped from 620 in 2001 to 32,563 last year.
"Honey, I'm going into labor. Get me on a plane to Taipei, NOW!"
(We can talk about how "all Taiwanese became Chinese" at a later date... OK?)



Answer
I am no immigration law expert, but from what I know, the short answer is yes.

The situation in Hong Kong is that pregnant Chinese women are going to Hong Kong to have children, leading to locals to stage a protest, arguing that public health resources are directed toward non-local people. As a result, public hospitals are crowded out, forcing Hong Kong women to seek higher priced medical service at private hospitals. While the number of pregnant women in mainland China traveling to Hong Kong have increased, it is thought that most of them are wealthy enough to buy their way into Hong Kong, the financial barrier is still great for most mainland Chinese.

From the public health perspective, Taiwan is already facing this kind of pressure, because Taiwanese doctors have all but fled the more traditional roles (pediatrics, surgical units, internal medicine, and obstetrics/gynecology), more and more doctors are seeking to practice in cosmetic surgery, which is much more lucrative in terms of effort and income ratio. If pregnant mainland Chinese come to Taiwan to have their babies, it is bound to have some impact on Taiwan's medical resources.

I know you are concerned about the issue of immigration, more so than the problems with Taiwan's public health. So here is my opinion.

There's a gradual increase of Taiwanese marrying mainland Chinese, and vice versa, happening in recent years, the government have set up tight control over who gets to enter Taiwan from mainland China. However, it does not seem there are tight rules over pregnant women seeking to have their babies in Taiwan. The same issue with having babies elsewhere, in Hong Kong or Taiwan, is the financial barrier. Taiwan's universal health care does not cover foreign individuals, therefore patients are required to pay at the full cost, which is quite a heavy sum.

Now if the situation is that PRC parents coming to Taiwan to have children, the current rule is that you still have to apply for legal status, which may or may not be approved. If one of the parents is a Taiwanese national, then you have a greater chance of being approved, providing that you have proof of parental DNA relationship. Both situations above require many paperwork, and is not easily fulfilled. To be honest, I think most mainland Chinese prefer to immigrate to the US, given that they can afford it. By the way, Hong Kong people also have a greater chance of being accepted to Taiwan.

In my opinion, Taiwan can probably take advantage of mainland Chinese immigrating to Taiwan. First of all, communist China will probably hesitate to raise a war with Taiwan, because it will cause casualties on their side. This might ease the tension across the straits. Secondly, to a raise a child in Taiwan is no small feat, Taiwan can harvest a lot of taxes off those rich mainland Chinese parents. Lastly, immigrating to Taiwan is very complicated, though I cannot definitively tell you there are no loopholes, I will tell you that once a mainland Chinese baby go Taiwanese, there's no turning back, because our system plainly works better.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Can you claim Job Seekers Allowance if you only want a part time job?

baby travel systems 2011 on Perego Pliko Four Travel System with a Diaper Bag Southpole: Baby
baby travel systems 2011 image



J


I have a 9 month old baby so would prefer to work part time - I am entitled to job seekers allowance but have first interview tomorrow and was wondering whether they will want me to look for full time work?


Answer
I hope this is what you are looking for;

Jobseeker's Allowance is a state benefit in the United Kingdom paid to people over the age of 18 years -- although there are circumstances when a 16- or 17-year-old can claim, mainly if estranged from their family -- who are looking for work or who work less than 16 hours a week on average. It is part of the U.K. social security benefits system and is intended to cover the living costs of the claimant. It is paid by the government Department for Work and Pensions and provides fortnightly cash payments as well as some additional benefits.

Types
There are two types of Jobseeker's Allowance: contributions-based Jobseeker's Allowance and income-based Jobseeker's Allowance. The first is provided to individuals who have previously paid sufficient National Insurance contributions (a tax, usually taken at source when working, that also goes towards your state pension). It is granted regardless of assets. Income-based Jobseeker's Allowance is for those who do not qualify for the contributions-based benefit. It is means-tested, taking into account individuals' savings and the income of their household.

Money
As of 2011, contributions-based Jobseeker's Allowance pays a weekly rate of £51.85 to those ages 16 to 24 years and £65.45 to those ages 25 years or older. For income-based Jobseeker's Allowance the rates are £51.85 for single people under 25 years and lone parents ages 18 and under; £65.45 for single individuals ages 25 years or older and lone parents ages 18 or older; £102.75 for a couple or civil partnership where both members are 18 or older. These rates are paid fortnightly to claimants by bank transfer.

Information
To claim Jobseeker's Allowance, individuals must demonstrate that they have been actively looking for work. Claimants meet with a Jobcentre Plus adviser on a fortnightly basis to assess the claimant's job search. The adviser has up-to-date information regarding possible vacancies suitable for the claimant and can advise on conducting a job search. He may also refer the claimant to relevant courses that might help her. Jobcentre Plus also provides newspapers and Internet access for job seekers to utilize.

Training
Jobcentre Plus also gives those looking for employment access to training programs. These programs are run either by Jobcentre Plus or outside agencies subsidized by the government. Such courses range from computer and interview skills to assistance with creating a curriculum vitae or résumé. In some cases, particularly after an individual has been receiving Jobseeker's Allowance for six months or more, such courses may become compulsory.

Complementary Benefits
Individuals who receive income-based Jobseeker's Allowance may also qualify for additional benefits. These include housing and council tax benefit, exemption from prescription charges, assistance with travel fares for attending hospital appointments, free NHS (National Health Service) dental treatment and free school meals for dependent children. All these benefits will be, like the Jobseeker's Allowance itself, means-tested and the level of each an individual receives will depend upon their assets and household earnings.



Read more: Job Seeker's Allowance Benefits | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/info_8069145_job-seeâ¦

Do Americans realize how much of a hole we're in?




Margaret S


Did you know the Fed pumped more money into the system in one year than what the Federal government collects in taxes in a year and we're still just plodding along.

Do Americans realize that the baby boom boom has gone bust?

Demographics, deleveraging and deflation will keep us depressed for a long time.



Answer
â¢First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
â¢First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States, and he's done it twice
â¢First President to violate the War Powers Act. (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/us/polâ¦
â¢First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico .
â¢First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
â¢First President to spend a trillion dollars on 'shovel-ready' jobs when there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs.
â¢First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
â¢First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
â¢First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
â¢First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
â¢First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.
â¢First President to terminate America 's ability to put a man in space.
â¢First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.
â¢First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
â¢First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
â¢First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.
â¢First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.
â¢First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
â¢First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
â¢First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).
â¢First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-Corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
â¢First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
â¢First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.
â¢First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 102 to date.
â¢First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.
â¢First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
â¢First President to go on multiple global "apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours.
â¢First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayer.
â¢First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
â¢First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
â¢First President to repeat the Holy Quran & tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.
â¢First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences".
â¢First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.
â¢First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states ( Mexico vs. Arizona ).
â¢First President to decline meeting with Isreal's prime minister to appear on the David Letterman show and go to his own fundraiser with Beyonce and Jay-Z.
â¢First President to blame a terrorist attack on a youtube video, and then spend $70,000 of taxpayer money to apologize to the murderers for hurting their feelings.
â¢First President to refer to the murders of a U.S. ambassador and navy seals as "a bump in the road."




Powered by Yahoo! Answers